Working Overtime To Earn Her Oy Moniker
“Boyles,” reports KGW, “said her poor finances and her epilepsy complicated her ability to follow rules.”
Addendum: All things considered, do you think it’s wise for Oy, when describing her new “watchdog” organization, to state that it is “orchestrated” by her? Isn’t that a word that normally conjures up… well, some sort of scheme?
Addendum: Theo‘s coverage of the hearing is up. The highlight? It’s on the second page of the online version.
Boyles talked often in the hearing about her daughter’s work but never in much detail, saying she didn’t want to divulge trade secrets. The letter, Boyles said, showed her daughter’s skills because it was cast to read like a 16-year-old’s writing. “The fact that she knows how to spin a letter” proves her talent, Boyles said.
Go back and re-read that.
Yes, it appears that Oy is claiming that the fact a letter by her 16-year-old daughter was “cast to read” like it had been written by someone of that exact same age is proof of her daughter’s talent.
Erm.
What?